Table of Contents
Was anyone prosecuted for Hillsborough?
The families have been bitterly disappointed by the prosecutions. Just one person has been convicted for anything related to the Hillsborough disaster: Graham Mackrell, the then Sheffield Wednesday secretary, of a safety offence, for which he was fined £6,500.
What was the Hillsborough verdict?
The jury had found that the 96 men, women and children who were killed on the football terraces in 1989 were unlawfully killed. And crucially, that they were not responsible for their own deaths.
Who was held accountable for the Hillsborough disaster?
On 12 September 2012, the Hillsborough Independent Panel concluded that no Liverpool fans were responsible in any way for the disaster, and that its main cause was a “lack of police control”. Crowd safety was “compromised at every level” and overcrowding issues had been recorded two years earlier.
Who was charged over Hillsborough?
Hillsborough disaster anniversary Mr Denton, Mr Metcalf and Mr Foster were charged in 2017 following an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) into allegations of a cover-up by police following the tragedy.
What went wrong at Hillsborough?
Hillsborough disaster, incident in which a crush of football (soccer) fans resulted in 96 deaths and hundreds of injuries during a match at Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield, England, on April 15, 1989. The tragedy was largely attributed to mistakes by the police.
What could have prevented Hillsborough?
Ninety-six fans died in the Hillsborough disaster, but the inquests heard their deaths could have been prevented if authorities had not made a number of mistakes.
Why is it now 97 Hillsborough?
A minute’s applause has been held at Liverpool’s first home game this season for a man who became the 97th victim of the Hillsborough disaster. He said the lifelong Liverpool fan had died from aspiration pneumonia, which had been caused by a brain injury due to oxygen deprivation and crush injuries.
What happened to David Duckenfield?
Hillsborough match commander David Duckenfield has been found not guilty of the gross negligence manslaughter of 95 Liverpool fans in the 1989 disaster. Mr Duckenfield, of Ferndown, Dorset, was cleared after a seven-week retrial at Preston Crown Court. …
Was duckenfield found guilty?
The acquittal of Hillsborough match commander David Duckenfield has caused shock and anger after a 30-year campaign for criminal accountability for the disaster. A jury found the former South Yorkshire Police chief superintendent not guilty of the gross negligence manslaughter of 95 victims.
Who is David Duckenfield and what happened at Hillsborough?
Hillsborough match commander David Duckenfield has been found not guilty of the gross negligence manslaughter of 95 Liverpool fans in the 1989 disaster. The former South Yorkshire Police chief superintendent, 75, was in charge of the FA Cup semi-final in which 96 fans were fatally injured.
Who is Richard Duckenfield?
The former South Yorkshire Police chief superintendent, 75, was in charge of the FA Cup semi-final in which 96 fans were fatally injured. Men, women and children were crushed on the Leppings Lane terrace. Mr Duckenfield, of Ferndown, Dorset, was cleared after a seven-week retrial at Preston Crown Court.
Why did Mr Duckenfield not give evidence in court?
Mr Duckenfield did not give evidence in the trial as the court heard he was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. Judge Sir Peter Openshaw also told jurors the condition could explain Mr Duckenfield’s lack of reaction as he sat in the well of the court throughout the trial.
What happened at Duckenfield in 1989?
The court heard that at the match on 15 April 1989, a backlog built up at the turnstiles after the police, under Duckenfield’s command, did not manage fans’ approach with filters or cordons. No successful measures were taken to alleviate the crush that developed after 2.30pm.