Table of Contents
How many nuclear bombs would it take to destroy the planet?
A declassified document shared by nuclear historian Alex Wellerstein gives the verdict that scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory and test site reached in 1945. They found that “it would require only in the neighborhood of 10 to 100 Supers of this type” to put the human race in peril.
What would happen if you nuked Venus?
One proposed way of altering Venus’ atmosphere is to bomb it with hydrogen. Hydrogen bombs, when reacting with the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, would create graphite and water. This would fall to the planet’s surface and cover 80\% of it with oceans. Mind you, they wouldn’t be nearly as deep as Earth’s oceans.
Can Titan be terraformed?
To break it down, only Enceladus and Titan appear to be viable candidates for terraforming. However, in both cases, the process of turning them into habitable worlds where human beings could exist without the need for pressurized structures or protective suits would be a long and costly one.
How many bombs would it take to destroy the world?
At this very moment, there are 15,000 nuclear weapons on planet Earth. It would take just three nuclear warheads to destroy one of the 4,500 cities on Earth, meaning 13,500 bombs in total, which would leave 1,500 left.
How many firestorms does it take to trigger a nuclear winter?
Although rarely discussed, the proponents of the hypothesis state that the same “nuclear winter” effect would occur if 100 conventional firestorms were ignited. A much larger number of firestorms, in the thousands, was the initial assumption of the computer modelers who coined the term in the 1980s.
Do nuclear explosions cause a nuclear winter?
As nuclear devices need not be detonated to ignite a firestorm, the term “nuclear winter” is something of a misnomer. The majority of papers published on the subject state that without qualitative justification, nuclear explosions are the cause of the modeled firestorm effects.
How do nuclear eruptions affect the climate?
Instead of sulfate particles, like you get from a volcanic eruption, a nuclear event produces soot, and that results in very different climate impacts. Whereas sulfate particles from a volcano might warm the air of the upper atmosphere by a couple degrees, black carbon absorbs heat from the sun and can lead to much more atmospheric warming.