How can ethics be justified?

How can ethics be justified?

Ethics are moral principles that administrate a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity. Justification is the act of presenting something to be right or reasonable. Some may say that ethics are the only reasonable justification for anything. Alternatively, one can argue anything may be justified ethically.

How can we under any circumstances justify war and violence?

According to Just War Theory, the reason for war should be to protect innocent life from danger. For example, if genocide is occurring in a country, war is justified as it aids the victims. In essence, the cause of war must be in self-defense or other’s defense to be ethical.

Can all acts be justified without ethics?

Unless some such ultimate moral principles can be shown to be justifiable, no other moral judgments can be shown to be justifiable.

Is it morally justified to target civilians during war?

The general rule. The general rule is that only those people fighting you are legitimate targets of attack. Those who are not fighting should not be attacked as this would violate their human rights. The Geneva Convention lays down that civilians are not to be subject to attack.

Is the just war theory ethical?

Just war theory is an ethical framework used to determine when it is permissible to go to war. It originated with Catholic moral theologians like Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas, though it has had a variety of different forms over time.

What is morally right but ethically wrong?

What is morally right but ethically wrong? Persecution on religious grounds is one of the most common examples of something that is morally right (or at least morally excusable) but ethically wrong.

What makes an act morally right or wrong?

So when looking at an act we can focus on the nature of the act itself or on the consequences. We can say the act is right or wrong because it is a certain kind of act, it fits in with certain principles or rules, or we can say the act is right or wrong because it results in good or bad consequences.

Is violence immoral?

Violence is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding: it seeks to annihilate rather than convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love.

What is concupiscence in ethics?

In theological ethics, concupiscence comes in three grades: it may cover first, the whole range of appetite and desire; secondly, that desire which is not deliberate, but a spontaneous reaction of the appetitive part of a person, and thirdly, that which actively opposes free and rational decision.

Can war ever be fought ethically?

A war might be ethical but the means unethical, for instance, using landmines, torture, chemicals and current debate is concerned with drones. Just War theory sets out principles for a war to be ethical. The war must be: Waged by a legitimate authority (usually interpreted as states)

Can you get killed in the military?

The U.S. military executed 160 American servicemen between 1942 and 1961. There have been no military executions since 1961, although the death penalty is still a possible punishment for several crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

When is the use of violence justified or justified?

However, as we progress into the 21st century, the line of when the use of violence can ever be “right” or justified is getting increasingly blurred. The need for war, punishment, and even domestic violence can be said to deter further violence or stop present violence from exacerbating. However, the use of violence to stop violence is debatable.

Can violence be just?

Can Violence Be Just? 1 As Self-Defense. The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. 2 Violence and Just War. What we have just discussed at the level of individuals can be held also for the relationships between States. 3 Idealistic vs. Realistic Ethics.

Can violence ever be justified in self defense?

Violence As Self-Defense. The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. If a person punches you in the face and seems intentions to keep doing so, it may seem justified to try and respond to the physical violence. It is important to notice that violence may come in different forms,…

Can a state be justified to respond violently to a violent attack?

What we have just discussed at the level of individuals can be held also for the relationships between States. A State may be justified to respond violently to a violent attack – be it physical, psychological, or verbal violence to be at stake.