Is balamuralikrishna a Brahmin?
Mangalampalli Balamuralikrishna now in his 84th year, remembers his first home in Sankaraguptam, East Godavari District, in Andhra Pradesh, a small house one among only six Brahmin dwellings in that village. Balamurali is perhaps Karnatic music’s most recounted child prodigy.
Can non Brahmins learn Carnatic music?
Anybody with such musical genes and interest in music is welcome to learn carnatic music. There is absolutely no bar on non brahmins learning carnatic music.
How old is Balamurali Krishna?
86 years (1930–2016)
M. Balamuralikrishna/Age at death
Legendary Indian musician M Balamurali Krishna, who delighted millions of fans for more than four decades, has died aged 86. Balamurali, as he was affectionately known, passed away in the south Indian city of Chennai after a long illness.
Did balamuralikrishna drink?
Balamurali smiled and said, “Yes, quite a considerable amount actually. But, back then, it did not affect his performance at all; in fact, maybe, it enhanced it”. Then he continued, “What is amritam, the nectar of gods? It is nothing but alcohol; in small amounts it is nectar and in large amounts poison”.
Is TM Krishna divorced?
He is married to Sangeetha Sivakumar, a reputed carnatic musician and they have two daughters.
Is TM Krishna right about Carnatic music system?
This is where the ongoing rant by TM Krishna against carnatic music system goes off on a tangent. When he initially made those noises of carnatic music being the preserve of Brahmins because of the lack of opportunities for training and performances, it did make sense because he was factually right.
Are Brahmins really the preserve of Carnatic music?
When he initially made those noises of carnatic music being the preserve of Brahmins because of the lack of opportunities for training and performances, it did make sense because he was factually right. Almost all the top ranking performers in the carnatic circuit were, and are, Brahmins and the markets were/are also dominated by them.
Is writing a convention a mechanical process?
We used to call these things “mechanics” but I think “conventions” is a much better term because it more accurately describes what these things are — historical agreements — and how we go about using them. To me, writing correctly is hardly a “mechanical” process; it takes a lot of human thought and ingenuity to do it well.
Is the Royal Prerogative a disadvantage to conventions?
In comparison, the scope of conventions is clear and so codifying them would ensure their limitations. In this sense, the royal prerogative demonstrates that though it may be a disadvantage codifying its own powers, conventions are safe from that perspective.