Table of Contents
- 1 Under what circumstances is it acceptable to use deception in psychological research?
- 2 Are there any circumstances where it is critical to use deception?
- 3 Is it ethical to use deception in psychological research?
- 4 What are some examples of ethical violations that have come up in research studies?
- 5 Is deception an ethical issue?
- 6 What is justified deception in ethics?
- 7 What are three arguments that reason why deception can never be justified and object to a practice?
- 8 Why is deception an ethical issue in psychology?
Under what circumstances is it acceptable to use deception in psychological research?
Deception in psychological research is often stated as acceptable only when all of the following conditions are met: 1) no other nondeceptive method exists to study the phenomenon of interest; 2) the study makes significant contributions to scientific knowledge; 3) the deception is not expected to cause significant …
Are there any circumstances where it is critical to use deception?
Deception can only be used when there are no reasonably effective, alternative methods available to achieve the goals of the research. Deception can only be used with study components that involve minimal risks (as determined by the IRB). Whenever possible, researchers must debrief subjects about the deception.
Is it ethical to use deception in psychological research?
a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study’s significant prospective scientific, educational or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.
What kind of ethical problems might have arisen from this deception?
The major ethical problem with deception in human experimentation is that it runs contrary to the basic principle of respect for persons and the related requirement of investigators to obtain informed consent for research participation (National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and …
What are the ethical issues in psychological research?
Ethical Issues in Psychology
- Informed Consent.
- Debrief.
- Protection of Participants.
- Deception.
- Confidentiality.
- Withdrawal.
What are some examples of ethical violations that have come up in research studies?
ETHICAL ISSUES IN RESEARCH
- Study design and ethics approval. According to COPE, “good research should be well adjusted, well-planned, appropriately designed, and ethically approved.
- Data analysis.
- Authorship.
- Conflicts of interest.
- Redundant publication and plagiarism.
Is deception an ethical issue?
In psychology research, deception is a highly debatable ethical issue. Others believe deception is necessary because it prevents participants from behaving in an unnatural way; it is important that participants behave the way they normally would when not being observed or studied.
What is justified deception in ethics?
Paragraph (a) in Standard 8.07 gives a good example of a utilitarian analysis “the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study’s significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value.” The phase “is justified by” reveals a utilitarian perspective: The good that comes from the deception must …
What is deception and when is it used in a research study?
Definition. Deception is the intentional misleading of subjects or the withholding of full information about the nature of the experiment. Investigators may mislead or omit information about the purpose of the research, the role of the researcher, or what procedures in the study are actually experimental.
What is ethical deception?
Deception and Ethics Deception is the act of misleading or wrongly informing someone about the true nature of a situation. Ethics in psychology refers to the rules of conduct for carrying out research in order to prevent harm and to properly inform participants of the nature of the study.
What are three arguments that reason why deception can never be justified and object to a practice?
Some researchers argue that deception can never be justified and object to this practice as it (i) violates an individual’s right to choose to participate; (ii) is a questionable basis on which to build a discipline; and (iii) leads to distrust of psychology in the community.