What has Judge Amy Barrett said about abortion laws?
Judge Barrett has considered three laws restricting abortions from her home state, Indiana. In all three cases, she expressed misgivings about earlier rulings from appeals judges that had struck down the laws.
Could judge Barrett be a different kind of Justice?
But while Justice Scalia’s methods occasionally drove him to liberal results, notably in cases on flag burning and the role of juries in criminal cases, Judge Barrett could be a different sort of justice.
What did Amy Barrett’s speech mean?
Barrett’s speech comes after a string of dramatic actions by the justices. She voted with the majority to let the Texas law that bars abortions at six weeks to remain in effect and also to block the Biden administration’s coronavirus-related eviction moratorium.
Who voted ‘no’ on Obamacare repeal?
Just one Republican, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who faces a tough re-election race, voted “no.” After the presiding officer, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, called the vote, a round of applause broke out in the chamber as Republican senators bumped fists to celebrate.
Does Judge Barrett’s outcome predict his position on the Supreme Court?
Judge Barrett had not written major opinions in any of those areas, and, in any event, the views expressed by appeals court judges do not always predict their positions when they are elevated to the Supreme Court.
Is it Barrett’s job to follow her policy preferences?
In her brief speech, Barrett promised to rule from the bench with strict independence. “It is the job of a senator to pursue her policy preferences. In fact, it would be a dereliction of duty for her to put policy goals aside. By contrast, it is the job of a judge to resist her policy preferences.