Table of Contents
- 1 Why is Ayodhya verdict so important?
- 2 Why is Ayodhya verdict wrong?
- 3 What was the decision of Ayodhya case?
- 4 Was Ayodhya verdict justified?
- 5 Who has made Babri Masjid?
- 6 Why is 6 December called black day?
- 7 Was Ayodhya built on vacant land?
- 8 What was the Allahabad High Court’s decision on the Ayodhya case?
Why is Ayodhya verdict so important?
The apex court, in a unanimous verdict, gave the ownership of the disputed 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya to the Ram Janmabhoomi trust. It ordered that an alternative piece of land in a “suitable” and “prominent” place in Ayodhya should be given to the Muslims to build a mosque.
Why is Ayodhya verdict wrong?
The reasoning, according to the learned judges, was that while both parties Ram Lalla Virajman and the Sunni Central Waqf Board had competing rights over the disputed site, lawyers representing the Hindus had provided better evidence of continuous worship compared to the Muslims.
What is the importance of Babri Masjid?
Babri Masjid (IAST: Bābarī Masjid; meaning Mosque of Babur) was a mosque in Ayodhya, India, at a site believed by many Hindus to be the birthplace of Hindu deity Rama. It has been a focus of dispute between the Hindu and Muslim communities since the 18th century….
| Babri Masjid | |
|---|---|
| Completed | 1528–29 |
| Demolished | 1992 |
What the Supreme Court’s Ayodhya judgment means for the future of the republic?
New Delhi: The Supreme Court’s verdict in the Ayodhya matter has settled the ‘title suit’ in favour of the main Hindu plaintiff – essentially the Vishwa Hindu Parishad – but it is clear that there is much more at stake for the country than the ownership of 2.77 acres of land on which a mosque stood for 470 years until …
What was the decision of Ayodhya case?
The Supreme Court in a unanimous verdict on Saturday cleared the way for the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site at Ayodhya, and directed the Centre to allot a 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.
Was Ayodhya verdict justified?
Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict has not upheld the law, nor delivered justice.
Was the Ayodhya Judgement fair?
The Ayodhya judgment did result in a victory for the majority and coincidentally for the mob that demolished the Babri Masjid, but a reading of the judgment clearly shows disapproval and disavowal of the mob. The legal victory is based upon secular principles. This has to be the projected as the victory of secularism.
Who is founder of Babri Masjid?
The Babri Masjid (“Mosque of Bābur”) was built in the early 16th century by the Mughal emperor Bābur on a site traditionally identified as Rama’s birthplace and as the location of an ancient Hindu temple, the Ram Janmabhoomi.
Who has made Babri Masjid?
Mir Baqi
– 1528: Babri Masjid built by Mir Baqi, commander of Mughal emperor Babur.
Why is 6 December called black day?
The demolition of the Babri Masjid was illegally carried out on 6 December 1992 by a large group of activists of the Vishva Hindu Parishad and allied organisations. On 6 December 1992 the VHP and the BJP organised a rally at the site involving 150,000 volunteers, known as kar sevaks.
What is the Ayodhya case and ASI report?
Ayodhya verdict and ASI findings: The Supreme Court has said on the basis of ASI report that the mosque was not built on vacant land. At the same time, the court said in its decision based on the ASI report that there is no strong information about the demolition of the temple and building a mosque.
What is the Ayodhya case and what is the verdict?
The five-judge constitutional bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, in a unanimous verdict, said that there is no strong evidence about breaking the temple and building a mosque. As per the Supreme Court’s verdict disputed Ayodhya site belongs to Hindus, and 5 acres of land to be given to Sunni Waqf Board.
Was Ayodhya built on vacant land?
Ayodhya verdict and ASI findings: The Supreme Court has said on the basis of the report of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) that the mosque was not built on vacant land.
What was the Allahabad High Court’s decision on the Ayodhya case?
The Allahabad High Court’s decision came on 30 September 2010 on the Ayodhya dispute. In this decision, the court ordered the 2.77 acres of land to be distributed between the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and Ramlalla Virajman. This order of the court was challenged in the Supreme Court.